USEIP County & Local Organizing Playbook is Now Available!

Since we began organizing in November 2020, we have documented our efforts, on all fronts, to be able to ensure that we don’t continually recreate the wheel, and so that we can provide resources (and a lot of lessons learned) for patriots in other states, counties, and localities. The resources provided here are free of charge. USEIP is an association of like-minded people working together to affect change locally. We don’t raise funds, and we don’t accept donations for any of the work we are doing. No one owns USEIP, and we don’t want your money either. We want YOU.

No, not to join USEIP. I mean, we’re awesome, but that’s not our goal. We want you to bring your skills, talents, and God-given passions to the movement to restore our Republic. Gather, understand what resources you have collectively – what skills, talents, and passions everyone brings to the table – and get to work. It’s going to take every single one of us.

We are scientists, mathematicians, cyber security experts, community organizers, writers, artists, former politicians, current and former military, corporate strategists, digital experts, super moms, pastors, prayer warriors, and so much more. We are young and we are old. We are black, white, and brown. We are the American People. AND, WE ARE THE PLAN.

Note! This content is provided, free of charge, for you to use. Do not monetize it. Thank you!

U.S. Election INTEGRITY PLAN. COPYRIGHT 2020-2021, USEIP. All Rights Reserved.

GRISWOLD PANICKED OVER COLORADO AUDITS: CALLS FOR INVESTIGATION OF DOMINION MACHINES.

[Sec State Griswold Sends Team to Mesa County– Attempting to Pre-Emptively Destroy Potential Election Data Release]

[Denver, Colorado, August 9, 2021] – Sec State Griswold published a news release today, claiming a data breach of BIOS passwords from Dominion machines has been published online. Griswold and her staff should know if the passwords are real because only they have access to the passwords. Colorado County Clerk and Recorders and their staff do not have password access. If true, then Griswold herself identified and connected the passwords to Mesa County, thereby jeopardizing the security of Mesa County voting machines.

Griswold is reportedly sending staffers to Mesa County to investigate – potentially seizing electronic voting equipment and data that might be critical to an independent forensic audit and to any law enforcement investigation into Griswold and her staff’s conduct.  Griswold has already proven her untrustworthiness as a public elections’ official with her illegal Emergency Rules Declaration heard last week in a public hearing.  Given Griswold’s tainted track-record in office, her overreach in Mesa County raises serious ethical and legal questions.

The Sec State claims that BIOS passwords from the Dominion machines were published on social media creating a data breach. The SecState did not produce any evidence of where the passwords were posted online, any confirmation that the passwords are indeed from the Mesa County Dominion machines, or any forensic analysis indicating who is responsible for the potential breach. Without any publicly released proof, the legitimacy of Griswold’s claims and subsequent investigation are highly questionable. How is the public to know someone from her office didn’t publish the passwords as a predicate to potentially molest election data from Mesa County, or to use this as a clear warning to County Clerks in Colorado to obey Griswold’s illegal mandates? Without a forensic deep-dive into the source of the supposed posting of the passwords – it appears Mesa County has a reasonable case to pause any investigation until irrefutable proof is presented by the Sec State.

Griswold’s demand for Mesa County surveillance video raises key questions:

  • What is being done with surveillance data from every other county in Colorado?
  • Why wasn’t the public allowed to know when Dominion personnel and Griswold’s staff were modifying Dominion voting machines starting in June?
  • Why did Griswold and Dominion hide the technical details of what was modified in the machines from the public and County Clerk and Recorders?

Last week, Griswold’s office was under overwhelming public pressure with record-breaking written and oral testimony on the August 3rd hearing. Citizens from all political backgrounds fought against Griswold’s Emergency Rules Declaration, citing an abuse of power; calling for a statewide forensic audit, and asking “what is there to hide?” The outpouring of testimony forced Griswold to shut down citizens from orally testifying and submitting any more written testimony submissions several days earlier than first scheduled.  The legality of shutting down testimony is now being investigated.  It appears Griswold’s action in Mesa County could be a retaliation for citizens calling-out Griswold’s unethical and illegal behavior.

Questions are being raised about the connection of Griswold’s panicked investigation to interfere Colorado County Commissioners’ supervision of elections, the impending report from the Maricopa Arizona forensic audit, and the nationally recognized Cyber Symposium being held in South Dakota from August 10-13th.  The purpose of the symposium is to publicly reveal and scrutinize new data from Dominion machines showing China’s ability and irrefutable evidence of machine penetration, changing 2020 election results.  Political elites from both sides including Griswold vigorously denying any possibility of election malfeasance have been in overdrive attempting to question the legitimacy of the data, experts, and citizens investigating the 2020 election results.

###

To share this press release with news outlets, blogs, chats and other organizations, here is the .pdf version of the news release.

Griswold Shuts Down Citizen Testimony

Sec State Griswold has prematurely shut down citizen testimony on the election rules hearing.  There were 50 citizens signed up to testify in the Aug 3 hearing that was supposed to continue into a second day given the citizen turnout.   Griswold stopped it!  It may be illegal for her to shut citizens out from the testimony procedure. 

Written testimony was officially announced to be accepted until Aug. 10.  Now that has been shut down.  What the hell is going on?  Tyranny in its purest form! 


ACTION:  call or email the SOS office and ask why they’re banning citizen input on illegal and unethical election rule changes!  
Sec State office: 303-894-2200 Elections@sos.state.co.us CC sos.rulemaking@sos.state.co.usandrea.gyger@sos.state.co.uscalebthornton@sos.state.co

Griswold Hides From CO Voter Testimony

CO SECSTATE JENA GRISWOLD HIDES FROM PUBLIC TESTIMONY: VOTERS CALL FOR FORENSIC AUDIT

[Bi Partisan Colorado Voters Submit Over One Thousand Petitions – Challenging Unconstitutional Elections Rules Changes in Hearing]

[Denver, Colorado, August 4, 2021] – In a public hearing, Colorado voters turned out in record-breaking numbers to publicly challenge Secretary of State Griswold’s proposed election rules changes.  Prior to the hearing, Colorado citizens submitted over a thousand petitions “overwhelming” the Sec State’s office.  The previous record number of petitions was 17.  The pervasive theme from Colorado voters was a call for a forensic audit of the 2020 election.  Listen to the 8/3/21 hearing.

In a shocking twist, not a single citizen supported Griswold’s proposed rule changes. Griswold and her committee were universally criticized for four hours straight by Colorado voters from all political leanings.  The hearing was originally scheduled to be two hours of testimony but had to be extended on-the-day due to the number of citizens signed-up to testify. 

Powerful citizen testimony mentioned dozens of Colorado counties had over 100% voter turnout on Nov. 3rd, issues with election power being centralized at the state level, and the unconstitutional nature of rule changes that bar third-party audits of Colorado elections past and future. Citizens rallied around the repeated question to Griswold, “What are you hiding?”

Griswold did not personally attend the hearing.  Committee members were called out several times for their inattention to citizen testimony.  One irritated citizen asked if a member would, “stop playing Candy Crush and listen.”  Committee members seemed surprised at the depth of citizens’ understanding of election law, procedures, policies, and experience.  Approximately 60% of the testimonies cited specific rule changes.

• The hearing was originally scheduled to resume on Thursday, August 4th at 10:00 a.m.  but in a last-minute change, the Secretary of State’s Office banned further citizen testimony.

• Petitions and written testimony will be accepted until 5:00 p.m. August 10th, however its rumored and the precedent has been set that the Sec State will likely shorten the window of opportunity early, so citizens are urged to act as quickly as possible. 

• Petitions and submission instructions can be found at https://useip.org/co-petition/.

###


ACTION ITEM: This press release is available for citizens to distribute to news outlets, local papers, TV news outlets, podcasters, YouTubers, etc. If you’ve never submitted a press release to a news outlet, simply download the document (below) and email it to your chosen outlet with a message explaining why the outlet should cover the story via their tips, or story suggestions.

Petitions, Hearings and What to Watch

WAY TO GO Colorado Patriots!  Dictator SOS Jena Griswold and her team have recieved the message loud and clear Colorado Voters do not want The Dictator’s emergency rules to be enacted permanently.  There are 325 officially submitted petitions as of July 20th (we’re also calling this petition 1 of 2 since this petition was first posted 7/1)  What’s interesting is that the Dictator’s office is behind on logging these petitions so the totals will continue to rise. A quote from The Capitol, “We’re totally overwhelmed.  We haven’t seen this many petitions, ever.”   Check for yourself if your petition has been logged and to watch the totals gro

Fast Fact:  It’s been reported that the highest number of petitions received at the SOS’ office is 17.  We have absolutely crushed that with 325 and counting, that’s 19x the number they’ve ever seen before.  Let’s keep it rolling.  We now have a second petition, here’s why…

Dictator Griswold Channels Mentor Stalin:  Griswold has officially denied the public a separate hearing to simply listen to The People about their concerns on the election emergency rules. This is a signal to all CO patriots that Griswold could be planning to ignore citizen’s testimony on her regular rules changes that are in addition to her emergency rules changes. In order to close this potential loophole, please sign, submit and share this SECOND PETITION. We’ve designed it to force Griswold to listen to us. All info, instructions & petition #2 are here.

Power Grabs are Back on the Menu, Boys!  Griswold’s normal rule changes are equally outrageous as the emergency rules.  In summary, The Dictator’s rules do two things.  First, it negates key decision making, auditing, transparency, and oversight abilities from both the County Clerks and Colorado voters who run elections.  Secondly, it centralizes election power to the State.  This is in direct contradiction to our Constitution and the election system our Founding Fathers set-up.  The whole idea of American elections is that the power rests in the hands of the people, decentralized, and on the local level.  Griswold is following the National Dem Playbook by attempting to seize power and centralize it at the state level.  This action sets up the next phase of rolling up the power to the Federal level.   These moves by the elites should be alarming to all Americans. Learn more.

August 3rd Hearing:  Griswold has decided to combine both the emergency rules hearing and her REGULAR rules changes into a single virtual hearing on August 3rd from 1:00- 3:00 pm. Sign up to testify here.  As of now, it appears that testimonies will be five minutes per person and done in the order people have signed up.  If you’ve never testified before it’s easy.  You write out what you want to say, and read it during your scheduled 5 minutes so it’s on the record.  It’s critical that we fill all the slots and don’t allow the opposition to sign up to testify in order to crowd us out.

I’ve Never Testified…What do I Say? First, we’d recommend you don’t drop the F-bomb in your testimony, but this advice only gets you so far.  All joking aside, a partner organization is offering a virtual boot camp to train folks on how to testify, how to say what you want in order to spur action, plus run through the basics of how the whole testifying process works. All who are planning on testifying are asked to attend one of the two sessions due to the nature of the information that will be shared.

Session 1 Sign Up:  Thursday, July 29th 7:00-8:00 pm.  

Session 2 Sign Up:  Monday August 2nd 7:00-8:00 pm.

WWDGD: What Will Dictator Griswold Do?

  • Will Dictator Griswold show up to listen to the people herself or will she command her staff to listen to the plebs in Colorado?
  • Will Dictator Griswold and her staff allow fair testimony from the people, or will she use every trick to delay and silence the folks testifying?  We saw it on the Dec. 14th hearing where the CO House Audit Committee allowed Wayne Williams and Scott Gessler drone on for hours, while the people with objective data and evidence of irregularities and anomalies in the election were cut off prematurely. 
  • Will Dictator Griswold take any of the people’s input onboard and reverse her illegal, unethical, and power consolidating rule changes?  Or will she simply slither over to the AGs Office post-hearing and give AG Weiser a knuck bump?

Griswold and The State have declared war on the people of Colorado…. Our opening salvo is the petition campaign leading to the Aug 3 hearing. This is the FIRST time Griswold and the AG have been challenged at this scale. Stay tuned, engaged, and active Patriots!

Never Trust a Clown

This article is a follow-on to the Only We Can Audit Ourselves published on 6/22/2021.

Colorado voters are engaged and watching SecState Griswold plus County Clerk and Recorders (CCRs) across the state when it comes to election records, and rule changes. In fact, this is not a recent development. Starting in late May 2021 citizen reports have been surfacing detailing the SecState and the CCRs blatant attempts at hiding and stonewalling voters access to information about Dominion voting machine modifications taking place now. Citizens are participating as their civic duty to better understand how Colorado elections are conducted and scrutinizing areas causing questions about security and transparency.

To illustrate the stonewalling, a concerned Fremont voter forwarded their interaction with Fremont County Clerk and Recorder Justin Grantham. This constituent approached Grantham asking when the Dominion modification was scheduled for Fremont Co. Instead of answering the question, Grantham asked why the citizen was enquiring. The citizen politely asked that Grantham delay the modifications based on two facts.

  • Dominion machines have not been properly certified by ProV&V according to the Colorado Constitution.
  • Colorado law requires election records be preserved for twenty-five months.

The voter explained to Grantham that because of the law, they’d like a pause in the Dominion modifications until August based on the rationale that no modifications should be conducted before a forensic analyst could properly preserve all hardware and software files, logs data etc. Grantham refused, citing a string of excuses that are so ridiculous and some flat out inaccurate, it exposes Grantham to be either completely ill-informed, woefully incompetent, or as we’ll find out- on the wrong side of election integrity. 

Below is the Fremont voters play-by-play interaction with Grantham. It starts out with the Fremont voter providing Grantham a source document of Pro V&Vs lapsed credentials from the EAC (Election Assistance Commission). In response to the voter’s documentation Grantham attempts to withhold public information.

Grantham Excuse #1  “Not valid proof because Dominion isn’t specifically mentioned.” 

This comment shows Grantham clearly has zero idea about the CO Constitution when it comes to voting machine certification laws. Grantham asserts that in Pro V&Vs (the testing lab) certification documentation from the EAC that Dominion, a completely independent entity should somehow be specifically mentioned in Pro V&Vs certificate? Perhaps this makes sense in the clown world Grantham lives.

Grantham Excuse #2  “If I pause the update, I will be out of ADA compliance.”

Given the fact that the election is in November, it’s unclear how Grantham is out of ADA compliance.  The voter is asking for a pause until August. That gave Grantham over two months (at the time of the request) before the election to do the modification. According to Dominion modifications are scheduled for two days.

Grantham Excuse #3 “This is a SOS software change.”  

We know the modifications are coordinated with the SoS, but it’s Dominion doing the modification. This response turns out to be quite telling (more on that below).

Grantham Excuse #4 “Also, we don’t use Pro V&V Software.”  Later Grantham clarifies that Pro V&V performs testing on Dominion machines.

Clearly Grantham spoke to someone or did a quick internet search to straighten-out his initial lack of basic understanding and blatantly inaccurate claim.

Grantham Excuse #5 Grantham then delivers The Gold Standard of Excuses, ”They [ProV&V] are current now.” 

Pure hilarity. (every time I run across excuse #4 proofing this piece I crack up harder –imagining Grantham driving a little red car to work and walking across the parking lot to his office; tripping over his big, red, floppy shoes). Grantham tries to sell the voter on the fact that despite being out of legal compliance for the 2020 election, meaning nobody knows (not even the SoS or any CCRs) what the Dominion machines are actually capable of doing – or if they’re secure… they’re good now.  They’re. Good. Now?! Honk. Honk.

Grantham Excuse #6 Grantham claims the lapsed legally mandated PV&V credentials the citizen provided are, “irrelevant.” 

With this type of reasoning what other rules and laws does Grantham think is irrelevant when it comes to elections?

Grantham Excuses #7  Cites CRS 1-5-601.5.

Grantham Excuses #8 Cites The 10th Amendment.  Then, follows up with a challenge:  the voter needs to prove if there are other state laws that force him to delay the update. (Grantham, putting the ass in classy as he works for his constituents.)

Grantham Excuse #9 At this point, fat fingers, nerves, or exasperation takes hold. Grantham claims, “Facebook is not an appropriate avenue (sic) to for formal request.”

As Grantham attempts to straighten himself out by adjusting his bright red nose, and curly rainbow wig, to Grantham’s credit he does invite the voter in for a meeting to talk further.  Hopefully he won’t bring his whoopee cushion.


Given my marketing background, I can’t help but to brand his chorus of faulty excuses, “The Grantham Anthem”, just imagine the background music is played on a kazoo.  The Fremont voter didn’t fall for Grantham’s song and dance.  The reward?  Grantham acquiesced and did tell the truth according to the schedule (above). [The Dominion update] “It’s either the 3rd or 4th week of July.”

In a final flail, Grantham decides to take to the press. In a piece that may have been drafted in crayon, but certainly borders on incomprehensible – he tries to defend his actions. What’s stunning is Grantham’s complete lack of understanding of the system, tech, and the law.  His hubris in challenging an engaged and informed voter who is earnestly and politely posing a legitimate request is quite something.  If Grantham is this lost, it’s clear he hasn’t even considered the implications to Fremont’s election system, the impact on voters, or his potential legal exposure of the Dominion update in terms of preserving election records.

It turns out, Colorado voters are persistent. In response to the public outcry over the wholesale stonewalling by the SOS and CCRs, State Rep. Ron Hanks and his coalition of election integrity minded legislators jumped in on behalf of their constituents. They officially requested the Dominion modification schedule from the SecState which had been hidden from the public. Hanks and his coalition should be commended for working for the people – a seemingly novel idea in today’s political climate. The elected officials were successful in finding out when the updates were happening.2021-colorado-upgrade-routes-date_county-1Download

What’s more interesting however, is the response letter from the SecState that accompanied the modification list. Griswold clearly asserts that anyone interested in election integrity and having a conversation with their local elected officials on the topic are somehow a threat to elected officials’ safety. Worse, Griswold claims that citizens who want to understand the election process in CO are involved in “conspiracy theories.” It seems appropriate to suggest Griswold read The Pentagon Papers, or study the 1960 election between Nixon and Kennedy before she starts throwing around terms she doesn’t grasp.Hanks response letterDownload

With Griswold’s carefully worded warning in the letter, it’s clear she feels entitled in her position. However, the signature of the letter tells a completely different story. Griswold includes signatures from two CCRs, Ortiz (D) of Pueblo County and Justin Grantham (R) of Fremont County. This is clearly a shaky attempt to fortify her weak position with a “bi-partisan coalition” of her own. Given Grantham was one of her picks to shore-up her unethical and possibly illegal behavior, the question becomes; did Griswold take a team-building workshop at #CHAZ or under a Ringling Brothers tent?

Griswold has beclowned herself by claiming conspiracy theories are circulating in CO. In this forwarded email it clearly shows there is indeed a coordinated effort to work against CO voters who are simply seeking the truth. The giveaway that this message comes from the SoS office are the contact names at the bottom. It may be a coincidence, but Judd Chode and Hillary Rudy are the official SoS elections contacts.

The case has been presented that the SecState and the Colorado County Clerks are in cahoots and are fighting against voters who want to find the truth. We also know that Griswold and the CCRs are fully panicked given citizens continue to push for answers. This leads us to the simple answer of why Griswold issuing unethical and potentially illegal emergency rules changes designed to stop citizens from activating third party election audits and a range of other investigative activities.

What can be done to stop this clown show? There is a petition that can be signed and submitted to the SOS. Find out more information on it and easy-to-follow instructions for how to sign, submit and share.

State Rep. Ron Hanks Lights a Fire: Creates Coalition to Challenge Griswold

In a recent show of strength, Rep. Ron Hanks issued a letter to Griswold and a press release challenging Griswold’s questionable and unethical attempt to update all Dominion voting machines in Colorado without notifying the public. What’s worse is once County Clerk and Recorders (CCRs) were asked by their constituents when the updates were to be conducted in their respective counties, vague and contradictory answers were given. Word traveled fast to the SecState from panicked CCRs. Turns out the Sec State is now hiding the update schedule to avoid public scrutiny. What is Griswold, the CCRs, and Dominion hiding?

Hanks took immediate action and created a coalition of “election integrity first” elected officials to join him in challenging Griswold. Strong move by Hanks and Reps Williams, Neville, Sandridge, and Ransom. Question now is why haven’t other elected officials joined Hanks – including Dems?

Action Item 1.) Contact your elected officials to demand they join Hanks’ coalition. Election integrity is a non-partisan issue. Find your legislator here…

Action Item 2.) Share this link with your friends, family, neighbors, and networks and explain why they should take action, too!

Griswold Proposes Additional Election Rule Changes: More Action Required.

In addition to the election “emergency rules” changes, Griswold is adding a whole new set of election rule changes. In summary, these additional rule changes seek to place the power of elections into the state’s hands. Centralizing election power is the enemy of a free Republic. Griswold’s new rules essentially rip the power from the people. Griswold is in direct contradiction to Abraham Lincoln’s notion that elections belong to the people.

Between every election, election rules change. Usually, the new rules are proposed, the SOS takes in written and verbal comment, a few adjustments are made, and the rules enacted. 

Using emergency rule status means the rules are enacted first, public comment via written input and public hearing comes second. 
The August 3rd hearing being held by the Secretary of State on rule making is the usual hearing on pending rule changes that have not yet been enacted. It now is also going to address the already enacted emergency rules about third party audits. 

There are two times listed for this hearing in various communications from the Secretary of State’s office: 1pm and 1:30 pm. 

Below is the file that goes over the changes in election rules that have been proposed through the normal process. The easiest way to review is by starting at page 17 of the pdf file. Unless the SOS changes course due to input, these rules will be enacted for the next election cycle. 

A few of changes being made by these proposed rules (if enacted): 

2.13.2  – Sec of State will now handle inactive voter registration cancelations. (Used to be handled by county clerks.)

7.3.2 through 7.3.5 – Significant reduction of electronic voting/ballot standards, elimination of ballot logs, tracking, etc. 

7.6 – Gutting of checks and balances to prevent abuse of online electronic balloting voters with disabilities.
More information about accessible electronic ballots: https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/accessibleVoting.htmlThese ballots can be printed at home on any printer and mailed in via any envelope at this website: https://myballot.sos.colorado.gov/app/home In the past, there was an application with an affirmation statement verifiying qualifying disability. It appears these signatures/ballots pinted on home printer paper are to be processed even without the application and in some cases where ID is required, without that ID submitted.

7.7.1 – Counties that use bipartisan judges for 1st level of signature verification of mail ballot signatures (the main way mail ballot voters are determinrined eligible) are no longer allowed to do so. It MUST be only one person of one party.

7.7.13(a) – Automatic signature verification software no longer has to be tested prior to the election.

8.10.2 – As per SB 250 and new state law, watchers are no longer allowed to challenge mail ballots based on discrepant signatures…
and…
8.13 – The alternative of signature escalation cards are also eliminated. (Esclation cards allowed watchers to require a set number of ballots signatures be reviewed at a second level by a second team before acceptance.)

9.2.2 –  Rules around election judge handling of mail ballots of voters determined to be dead by bipartisan election judge teams are very unclear to many.   

10.1.5 – Canvass board role is gutted. If canvass board members or the county clerk finds an issue, they no longer have a rule allowing them to contact election judges to resolve it or for an explanation or correction.

10.3.2 – Canvass board no longer accounts and balances the election. They no longer certify the official abstract of votes. They no longer reconcile the number of ballots cast to the number of voters who voted by reviewing a variety of documents they reveiwed in the past. They used to review detailed logs and statements of ballots. Now they are not required to review these documents.

10.3.3 — If the canvass board identifies a discrepancy in a Statement of Ballots form (which they are no longer required to see) the board may no longer review the particular ballots at issue to identify, correct, and account for the error.

20.11.2 – Elimination of seals, chain of custody logs, transfer logs of voting equipment used in vote centers. Reduces ability to catch acts to tamper with machines store overnight in vote centers.

20.19.5 – Secrecy envelopes no longer required in vote centers. No longer required to track serial numbers of voting equipment or log those who are using admin functions to allow election judges to change counting of overvotes.

Action 1). Written comment on all election rules including these can be found here:  https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/rule_making/hearings/2021/ElectionsRulesHearing20210803.html

Action 2). If you have concerns about any of these changes, you can email your comments to SoS.Rulemaking@sos.state.co.us or register to give verbal comment here: https://register.gotowebinar.com/register/3181275682733744144

You can give comment about the emergency rule use regarding third party citizen audits and any other issues with the other election rules as well. 

Action 3). Sign and share the “emergency rules petition”

Action 4). Read Griswold’s Rules

Action 5). Monitor when your petition was received by the SOS https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/rule_making/hearings/2021/ElectionsRulesHearing20210803.html

Only We Can Audit Ourselves

The forensic audit in Maricopa County, Arizona poured fuel on the prairie fire of legislators and concerned citizens who are still asking questions, wondering what happened in their states, and looking to find the truth about the 2020 elections. The fact that AZ is doing the first audit of its kind in the nation has raised a number of interesting issues as to what needs to be looked at and how in an era of technology-dependent elections. It’s no longer simply canvassing, paper ballots, procedures, and tallies. Comprehensive and adequate audits now must include the tech that we’ve allowed to take over our elections. Databases, software, hardware, cybersecurity, data, accreditations, certifications, testing, tech competency, user management, access control, and more. Given all the technology used in our elections, state and federal laws mandating the preservation of unmolested election records must apply to all the tech that produces artifacts. Once these artifacts are reconstructed, it objectively illustrates what happened in any given election.

Up until now, Colorado has remained out of the national discussion about election integrity, fraud, and forensic auditing.  That changed on June 17th when Secretary of State Jena Griswold announced that she and her office would not allow Arizona-style forensic audits by third parties in Colorado. Which is ironic because, she’s essentially claiming that no one may audit the State but the State. Xi whiz, is she just Stalin for time? Given the incredibly complex technical nature of so many of today’s election systems, third parties are the only ones with sufficient technical expertise to provide any understanding of whether systems have been compromised.  Griswold’s announcement on Twitter was so heavily ratioed, she won “the gold standard” award for Tweeting (using the same criteria she used to determine that Colorado’s election system is the “gold standard”).  The responses to Griswold’s ham-fisted, panicked announcement show how witty, hilarious, and ticked-off Colorado voters are. Lauren Boebert, Ted Cruz, Jack Posobiec, Boris Epshteyn and other national figures joined in, publicly and rightfully roasting Griswold.   Read more…

Election Integrity or Gaslighting

By Peg Cage

“Gaslighting is an elaborate and insidious[i] technique of deception and psychological[ii] manipulation… to gradually undermine the victim’s confidence in his own ability to distinguish truth from falsehood, right from wrong, or reality from appearance, thereby rendering him pathologically dependent on the gaslighter in his thinking or feelings.”[iii]

We the concerned electors of Colorado should wonder if our elections were corrupted, as suspected in other states.  Oddly however, the Colorado GOP Chairman hosted a state-wide video call for party members with three Republican County Clerks, all denying fraud and claiming our system is the “Gold Standard” for elections.[iv] 

I think it is closer to Fool’s Gold than a “Gold Standard.”[v]  Four elected officials proclaiming that we should trust the election results is a gaslighting tactic that will make many people question the validity of the thousands of legal affidavits of fraud nation wide.

At the 12-15-2020 Colorado Legislative Audit Committee hearing, a Retired Air Force Officer testifying on cyber security said, “When the Department of State claims they have the ‘most secure elections,’ they have no basis of expertise to make that claim.” [vi]

Then there was this:
Denver, December 22, 2020 – The United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Colorado has awarded the Secretary of State’s Election Security unit with its Award of Excellence for its role in safeguarding the 2020 General Election. [vii]

Our doubts about election integrity should not be lessened when one government entity gives another government entity an award.  Instead, we should look more closely into those entities[viii] to see if this is a gaslighting technique.

In November, the Republican Canvass Board members from four different Colorado counties refused to certify the election.[ix]  One called for an audit of the election software. The others cited a variety of reasons in their minority reports, including the media’s cover-up of the Joe Biden scandals.  How can we have “Gold Standard” and “Award winning” elections with so much doubt in their integrity?

Never should there be hidden processes between the citizen’s legally cast ballots and the counting and recording of our votes.  There must never (NEVER!) be any other kind of ballots counted besides those that were legally cast. 

Above all, NEVER should we allow anyone to “win” an election because gaslighters demand we trust them.  Indeed, the very people who claim there is no election fraud also control every aspect of Colorado’s elections from the political party’s selection of candidates, to the casting of our ballots,[x] to the declaration of winners.

Legal ballots from legal voters should be the only determinant in who operates our government and what laws are implemented.  To ensure election integrity, We the People must realize and reaffirm that “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed…”[xi]  Elections are the vehicle by which our consent is to be determined. 

To cure gaslighting, one must remove oneself from under the control of the entities doing it.  The line in the Declaration of Independence that follows the one quoted above is “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…”[xii]

A government that subjects its citizens to fraudulent elections must be altered or abolished.  If “new Government” is our right, then it is our duty to demand integrity in the elections whereby we choose our governing officials.  Election fraud undermines our ability to guarantee a Government OF the People.  There is no amount of gaslighting that can change that, but the gaslighters are counting on us to remain silent and under their control.  We must stop being their victims. 

We must wake up, Rise Up!, and demand integrity.

Originally published on January 26, 2021 at https://mycoloradogop.org/103-election-integrity-or-gaslighting. We are reposting here with permission from the author.


[i] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/insidious

[ii] https://www.britannica.com/science/psychology

[iii] https://www.britannica.com/topic/gaslighting

[iv] https://www.denverpost.com/2020/12/03/ken-buck-election-colorado-republicans

[v] https://mycoloradogop.org/70-don-t-trust-colorado-s-elections

[vi] https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?v=756793398521499&ref=search (Sean Smith 7:59:20)

[vii] https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/newsRoom/pressReleases/2020/PR20201222Award.html

[viii] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDwMhV3_ZFc&feature=youtu.be (Tom Fitton, starting 22:05)

[ix] https://mycoloradogop.org/97-four-counties-wont-certify-2020-general

[x] https://mycoloradogop.org/70-don-t-trust-colorado-s-elections

[xi] https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript

[xii] https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript