New Evidence in Colorado Catches Embattled Secretary of State Off Guard

Ashe in America has written another enlightening post about the fiery drama around Jena Griswold, Colorado’s infamous Secretary of States.

This is a developing story, but I want to get this out so that everyone understands what’s happening. Things are heating up in Colorado. Here is what we know.

jena gets some bad news

On Monday, January 24, 2022, Jena Griswold was having a very bad day. 

As everyone should know by now, Jena is facing a pretty explosive lawsuit from elected officials around the state of Colorado. If you need to catch up, you can read about that here: Griswold is in Hot Water

A big part of that case is the saga of Tina Peters and Mesa County, so you should read up on that as well, especially if you’re new to Colorado’s role in the stolen election on November 3, 2020. 

Continue reading at AsheInAmerica.com.

This Week: Corrupt WI RINOs Trying to Legalize Dropbox Scam

Wisconsin is in the spotlight this week. The legislative session ends shortly, which means that laws that are voted on and passed stand until the legislature reconvenes in the fall. The Wisconsin legislature is going to try and legalize the dirty Mark Zuckerberg’s Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) drop-box scam…

THE RUNDOWN

1) Wisconsin legislators – driven by the RINOs are proposing legislation to legalize ballot drop boxes in WI. 
2) This week its expected the legislators will try to make this an official bill.  As of now, they have not put this proposed legislation into an official bill, but the word from WI grassroots is that the bill is eminent and everyone in WI is geared up for the bill to be given a number and put on the docket for a vote most likely next week.
3)  The impact is that essentially the RINOs are legalizing a well-known vector for voter fraud in WI – ballot drop boxes.
4)  It gets sinister –  the grassroots see what’s coming.  The legislators are going to try to ram this bill through and then close session until the fall – which would be too late to dispute/repeal the law before 2022 elections. 

IMMEDIATE ACTION NEEDED

  1. Contact WI legislators and let them know that they better not even propose this bill.
  2. Make the consequences clear if they create the bill. This is not the type of legislation voters want. In fact, voters WILL NOT STAND for the legalization of voting methods that are a PROVEN method and vector for election fraud.  
  3. If they’re as feckless as the legislators appear, and it goes to a vote – they’d better NOT VOTE FOR IT or the consequences will be severe. There will be political and media action from across the nation. 
  4. Pay special attention to Robin Vos. She’s the lead RINO in the WI legislature

Vos, Robin (R – Rochester)
Speaker
District 63
Details
Website
Telephone:
(608) 266-9171
(888) 534-0063

Email:
Rep.Vos@legis.wisconsin.gov

ALL WI LEGISLATOR CONTACT INFORMATION

We’re Over the Target… They’re Panicked… Let’s Act Quickly!

**URGENT CALL TO ACTION***PATRIOTS PLEASE CALL AND EMAIL NO LATER THAN TUESDAY 1/18 AT 10AM

This coming Tuesday (yes, two days from now), the Colorado House of Representatives will be asked to vote on a Resolution to:

1 Reassert the validity of the 2020 presidential elections as legitimate and verified.

2 Offer Colorado’s election system as a model for states across the country.

3 Call on the federal government to pass comprehensive voting rights legislation.

You will find the text of the Resolution below.https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/HR22-1004

please call and email all of the Representatives and KINDLY explain:

1 The validity of the 2020 election – presidential or otherwise – is questionable and deserves a full forensic audit.

2 Colorado’s election system should not be exported to other states, since according to the Heritage Foundation’s Election Integrity Scorecard, Colorado is ranked 34th in the nation.

3 The federal government needs to stay out of election law.

We’re over the target, people… Let’s press for the win.

Please copy/paste and share.

FBI Raids in Colorado

Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters and America’s Mom Sherronna Bishop have been raided by the FBI the week before last. Below is a sample of interviews where they tell their stories. Please share these links via social media, email, and text.

Sherronna Bishop on the Mike Gallagher Podcast: Salem Media

Sherronna Bishop on Warroom with Steve Bannon

Tina Peters Full Interview on Warroom with Steve Bannon

Gold Star Mother, Tina Peters interviewed on Warroom with Steve Bannon

Sherronna Bishop, First American Mother raided by the FBI on FrankSpeech.com

GRISWOLD IS IN HOT WATER!

COLORADO SECRETARY OF STATE JENA GRISWOLD SUED OVER DESTRUCTION OF ELECTION RECORDS, FAILURE TO PROPERLY TEST VOTING EQUIPMENT, AND OBSTRUCTION OF INDEPENDENT ELECTION AUDITS

Colorado citizens [Editor’s note, this suit is not a USEIP lawsuit. USEIP is only reporting on the official court case filing] sue Secretary of State Jena Griswold over election violations. Case requests full forensic audit of Colorado voting systems and 2020 election to ensure free and fair elections for Colorado voters.

[Denver, Colorado, November 19, 2021] – Today an explosive case, Hanks et al v. Griswold was filed in Denver District Court. The most damning facts of the case claim that Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold and her employees destroyed election records from the 2020 election. Griswold and other Colorado election officials are required by state law to preserve those election records for twenty-five months, and by federal law for twenty-two months. The relief sought in this case is a full, independent forensic audit of Colorado voting systems and the 2020 election in Colorado so citizens’ trust in their elections might be restored.

When asked whether the deleted elections records were significant or simply inconsequential extra files on election servers, or electronic voting equipment, Col. (ret.) Shawn Smith USAF systems testing expert stated, “The Federal Election Commission’s 2002 Voting System Standards, which are a mandatory standard for Colorado voting systems, require voting systems to maintain and produce ‘all audit trail information,’ including operating system and hardware. The Department of Justice has already confirmed that digital records ARE election records. The federal and state statutes that require preservation of election records were written for the EXACT purpose of ensuring the availability of records EXACTLY like the those destroyed by the Secretary of State.”

A second claim in the case states that Griswold “failed to employ a federally accredited laboratory to test Colorado voting systems before the 2020 election.” When investigating whether the claim is a mere clerical oversight, the exhibits included in the case show otherwise. Griswold’s selected testing lab’s, Pro V&V’s, accredited status expired in 2017. The next time Pro V&V was officially accredited was 2021. However, in 2019, Griswold issued an official letter [exhibit 1] approving Pro V&V’s test plans, and Griswold cited that testing in her certification of Colorado voting systems used in November 2020. Within the forty-seven months Pro V&V was unaccredited, meaning the lab was not qualified to conduct proper electronic voting equipment testing, Griswold repeatedly used the testing lab and cited its testing reports.

Colorado voters shouldered all the risk when Griswold approved an unaccredited lab to test voting systems. Every single Colorado county used voting equipment during the 2020 election that was not properly tested, and the lapsed lab accreditation likely affected the voting systems used in the 2021 election, as well.

The final claim in the case against Griswold addresses what appears to be Griswold’s attempt to cover-up potential wrongdoing. In June 2021, Griswold issued emergency election rules limiting who can access electronic voting equipment; “Defendant’s [Griswold’s] employees, County Clerk’s employees, election judges, and voting system vendors. No independent consultants are allowed.” Griswold’s emergency election rules impact Colorado elections in two distinct ways.

First, the rules ensure that any independent forensic audits of election equipment, which is exactly what Colorado citizens are asking for, are forbidden. Secondly, none of the people or parties Griswold identifies as being allowed to access voting equipment have adequate technical expertise to verify the electronic voting equipment.

###

To share, repost, and republish download the official USEIP press release below that covers the contents of the official court case filing. Editor’s note, this case is not a USEIP lawsuit.

CITIZENS LOSE AGAIN: COLORADO SECRETARY OF STATE GRISWOLD STRIPS LOCAL CONTROL OVER ELECTIONS

A Colorado Supreme Court ruling supports the state stripping power from county officials and citizens. Local election control, administration, and oversight now under Sec State Griswold’s power

[Mesa County Colorado, October 21, 2021] – The Colorado Supreme Court declined to hear Clerk Tina Peters’ appeal based on last week’s ruling in Mesa County.  The lower court ruling does not address Secretary of State Griswold’s misconduct and potentially illegal action of destroying Mesa County election records which are required by state and federal law to be preserved.  The Supreme Court case addresses the legality of whether or not Secretary of State Griswold has the authority to remove a duly elected official from office.  The Supreme Court’s inaction does not confirm the validity of the legal claims, or act as an endorsement of the lower court’s ruling.  The Supreme Court simply confirmed legal procedures were followed in the Peters’ case.  

The implications of the high court’s failure to act confirms that last week’s ruling in the lower court stands.  This means Secretary of State Griswold has successfully circumvented the will of the voters by removing another elected official.  This ruling concentrates election power at the state level which is in direct contradiction to the fundamentals of the U.S. Constitution.  The electoral structure in the U.S. is designed to be decentralized, administered, and overseen on the local level by citizens in each locality – not state or federally run.

“The inaction of the Colorado Supreme Court is a very unfortunate day for self-government and the balance of power in Colorado.  Secretary of State Griswold believes that duly elected County Clerks serve at the pleasure of her and the Secretary of State’s Office.  The people who voted for their local election officials have been severely violated with this action.” said Clerk Peters

What spurred Griswold’s overreach was that Clerk Peters arranged for forensic images (complete backups) to be taken of the county’s election equipment before and after a May 2021 software modification.  The equipment modification was performed by the office of Secretary of State Gena Griswold and Dominion Voting Systems.  Peters suspected that the update would destroy critical election records that Peters is required by state and federal law to preserve. 

Griswold has taken nearly thirty separate campaign donations from Dominion Voting Systems in 2021 alone.  This clear conflict of interest raises questions about why Griswold has relentlessly attacked Clerk Peters simply for following the law and upholding her sworn duty as Clerk and Recorder of Mesa County.  

In Peters’ diligence to protect Mesa County election records, Clerk Peters commissioned a forensic analysis of the backups with the purpose to confirm or deny whether Griswold and Dominion destroyed election records.  The forensic analysis generated a peer-reviewed report by a renowned cyber expert, Doug Gould.  The report vindicated Peters’ concerns. It showed that some 29,000 critical election records were unequivocally and completely destroyed.

The implications of Griswold and Dominion Voting Systems destroying the election records are serious. Griswold has successfully prevented any future forensic audit of the 2020 election in Mesa County.  This creates legal questions for Mesa County citizens.  According to Colorado State Law, they have the right to call for and have an audit conducted at any time for twenty-five months.  Additional court action is expected to resolve this issue.

The Mesa County Forensic Image Analysis Report is publicly available as part of the Peters official court filings and at useip.org.

Started by volunteers in Mesa County Colorado, StandwithTina.org is the official site for news, events, fundraising, and media enquiries for Clerk Tina Peters.

                                                                                    # # #

Help distribute the real news. Download a .pdf copy of the official press release (above) and submit to your local news tip lines, online outlets via email, and on social media pages.

Bombshell Report Proves State and Federal Election Crimes Were Committed – County Commissioner Leaks to Press Instead of Reporting Crimes

Mesa County Clerk and Recorder Tina Peters in good faith delivered an initial forensic cybersecurity report covering election machine analysis to County Commissioners. The report proves destruction of evidence. One or more Commissioners misrepresent report to the press -fail to report crimes.

[Mesa County Colorado, September 21, 2021] – Tina Peters hand-delivered an initial peer-reviewed forensic cybersecurity report prior to the late Friday evening filing of her official defense pleading alerting County Commissioners of crimes.  The extensive report vindicated citizens’ concerns about 2020 election malfeasance, justifies Peters preservation of election records obligated by federal and state law, and proves crimes were committed by others – not Peters.  Instead of submitting the report to the authorities which is their civic duty, one or more of the Commissioners forwarded the report to the press.  There is no question the Commissioner(s) leaked the confidential document given the version of the report was initial, lacking some detail which the official report included.

The expert-generated forensic cybersecurity report signed by cyber-expert Doug Gould, detailed a pattern of systematic destruction of election records in Colorado voting systems by the Secretary of State’s staff and voting system vendor during the “Trusted Build” updates that took place in Colorado over the summer. It’s expected the report will become a part of several pending investigations and lawsuits.  Additional legal questions are now raised regarding premeditation and conspiracy.

Peters commissioned the detailed forensic examination by court-recognized expert cybersecurity witnesses including Gould as part of her duties as Clerk and Recorder. The report now supports her legal defense against Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold’s legal accusations.

The report proves a simple storyline of events and subsequent implications

  1. The Destruction of evidence. Destruction of election records, election-related data that’s required to be preserved under federal and state law.
  2. Thousands of election records were destroyed.
  3. Secretary of State Griswold and the vendor deleted the election records.
    1. Through the “Trusted Build” hardware and software election systems update.
    1. By way of Griswold’s approved procedures for the updates.
    1. Due to Griswold’s certified election system configuration. Configurations directed by the Secretary of State were designed to automatically overwrite election data.
  4. The election system was illegally certified. The report stops short of stating Griswold’s certification of the voting systems complete with an election record-destroying configuration was illegal. However, Colorado statute is explicit that the Federal Voting System Standards are mandatory. The SecState’s certification allowed the use of a non-compliant voting system in Colorado elections.
  5. The deleted election records eliminate the possibility of a complete forensic election audit. The type of audit SecState Griswold has sought to prohibit by her controversial election rules which were rubber-stamped into law through CO Attorney General Phil Weiser.

It is unclear whether the Mesa County DA has sole responsibility to investigate the criminal violations. Alternatives include whether the matter must be referred to Federal authorities, the Colorado Attorney General, or every state jurisdiction affected by the technical discovery. The next outstanding question is whether Mesa County Commissioners have any liability for failing to investigate and submit the report’s findings to the authorities as required by§ 18-8-105.

Mesa County Commissioner Rowland now faces a dilemma. On one hand, she is on the record interrogating Mesa County citizens in a hearing where the Commissioners apparently invited both press and anti-election integrity industry insiders.  During the hearing, Rowland aggressively pressed why citizens didn’t “bring the proof [of fraud] to the authorities.” At the time, citizens explained that the production of the evidence Rowland was demanding required an investigation of the machines, which citizens had previously requested.  On the other hand, at the time of Rowland’s irrational demands, she knew access to the voting machines was impossible, given the equipment was sequestered. 

In the County Commissioner’s public hearing on September 20th McInnes stepped into the breach (~25:00) claiming Peters’ report was “anonymous” insinuating there was no official report author. Instead of McInnes successfully bashing the report that clearly is proof of criminal activity, McInnes showed he didn’t completely read; or grasp the contents of the report. McInnes beclowned himself by claiming the “goal posts have been moved” as damning election malfeasance evidence piled-up in succession over months. It appears McInnes lost the plot, or doesn’t care.

In a final attempt to disparage Peters, McInnes repeated false accusations by Secretary of State Jena Griswold.  The false claim is Peters leaked passwords during her legal back up of election systems. McInnes is weak on the facts.  It was Griswold who was in sole custody of the BIOS passwords in question; she bears the responsibility to prove she or her office didn’t lose control of their passwords.  Mesa County Commissioners continue to show their fecklessness, dishonesty, and lack of understanding given the report Peters delivered was a courtesy initial version.  The official report filed in Peters defense pleadings is complete with any information Rowland, McInnes or Davis claim falsely, to be missing. 

Since May, citizens across Colorado have been asking Clerks to delay the “Trusted Build” to preserve election records and afford citizens the opportunity to conduct an independent forensic audit. But the shadow emerged of a coordinated campaign by the Secretary of State and the Colorado County Clerks Association (CCCA) leadership, to deprive citizens of knowledge of the “Trusted Build” schedule, and to cajole and coerce reluctant Clerks El Paso County Clerk and Recorder Chuck Broerman and Weld County Clerk Carly Koppes, the President of the CCCA. Both claimed in meetings with citizens that the Secretary of State’s and the Colorado Attorney General’s Offices issued formal warnings to them advising against allowing citizen access election records for audits, including electronic records generating from the Dominion voting systems; or they would be “sued.”

The result of forensic analysis of Mesa County’s system backups completely upends the accusations against Peters.  It’s now clear Griswold’s and the media’s initial characterization of Peters was patently false.  Peters acted in good faith, despite immense pressure from Griswold’s false accusations in what appears to be intentional attempts to coerce and intimidate her.

Also destroyed are current and former Secretaries of State Wayne Williams, and Griswold’s claims to “Gold Standard” security for Colorado elections. The expert report proves serious crimes were committed by Peters’ accusers and may save or implicate other Colorado County Clerks. Given this proof, County Clerks across Colorado are at risk of being responsible for election crimes simply for trusting Matt Crane the Executive Director of the CCCA, The Secretary of State Jena Griswold, and electronic voting machine vendors.

The report bears serious legal implications beyond Peters’ defense case and Griswold’s motivations to focus law enforcement resources on Peters. Now voting system vendors, the voting system testing lab, and U.S. Election Assistance Commission officials may have some explaining to do.

Share this official press release in .pdf format


ANTI-ELECTION AUDIT HEAVYWEIGHTS ATTACK MESA LOCALS FOR DEMANDING ELECTION INTEGRITY

In a meeting with County Commissioners and Mesa locals, Commissioner Janet Rowland and County Attorney Starr ignore citizens. Accuse locals and Clerk Peters of criminality – Fail miserably. Potential collusion exposed.

[Mesa County Colorado, September 2, 2021] – In a last-ditch effort to convince Mesa County Commissioners to opt out of a seven-year contract with Dominion Election Systems, America’s Mom, Sherronna Bishop asked for a private meeting with the local officials. The goal of the meeting was to present information on voting system security vulnerabilities, facts about the machines including built-in wireless modems, and several alternatives for running elections if Dominion voting systems were to be eliminated in Mesa County.

Following the lack of understanding the Commissioners displayed in previous hearings, Bishop wanted to offer Commissioners a private forum to ask questions to expand their understanding of complex electronic voting systems which are outside the Commissioner’s expertise. The meeting was expected to be private among local officials and stakeholders from Mesa County. Prior to the meeting, Bishop was asked to submit a list of her limited team members including systems testing expert Ret. USAF Col. Shawn Smith from the U.S. Election Integrity Plan.

In a shocking twist, the meeting was open and attended by a large cadre of people who have chronically dismissed citizen’s concerns and expert testimony on election integrity. Surprise attendees included:

  • The hostile establishment press: including CNN, KUSA/9 News, and Grand Junction’s Daily Sentinel.
  • Law enforcement: Including Mesa County Attorney Starr and the FBI.
  • Dominion representatives: Steven Bennett a holder of two U.S. Patents for Dominion’s adjudication in voting systems using ballot images.
  • Colorado County Clerk’s Association leadership: Carly Koppes, Chuck Broerman, and Justin Grantham. Noticeably absent was the CCCA’s Executive Director, Matt Crane whose conflicts of interest keep mounting. His wife worked for Dominion for years while Crane was a CO County Clerk. Missing from Crane’s Linkedin is his current Executive Director position at the CCCA.
  • Secretary of State’s senior staffers: Trevor Timmons, Judd Choate, Matt Dombeski, and Jessi Romero.
  • A paid national anti-election integrity activist: Ryan Macias who works with Matt Crane at the Lafayette Group. Macias is known for attempting to sabotage the Maricopa AZ audit by sneaking into the secure facility and lying about having press credentials. Crane invited Macias to speak at the summer CCCA Conference. Macias stated, in the secrecy of the CCCA-hosted meeting of the Colorado County Clerks, that his organization intends to discredit the Maricopa Audit Report before it’s even released.

It remains unclear whether the private meeting link was leaked or deliberately shared by the Commissioners. The fact that so many anti-election integrity media, bureaucrats and law enforcement attended a meeting between local citizens and their county officials raises serious questions for these County Commissioners. Why would so many anti-integrity officials, who are on the record defending Colorado’s failed election security as the “Gold Standard,” care to attend a local meeting discussing a Dominion voting machine contract? What is the connection between Mesa County Commissioners, anti-election integrity elected officials, the Sec State, and law enforcement?

The reason there may be a connection between the Mesa County Commissioners, law enforcement, and the Secretary of State is because of their intense interest in Tina Peters the Mesa County Clerk and Recorder. Peters became the global face of election integrity in August by upholding her oath as an elections official. Her crime? Preserving 2020 election records, mandated by State and Federal law. In anticipation of Griswold’s and Dominion’s voting system “Trusted Build” hardware and software “update”, Peters had Mesa County’s Dominion system records completely backed-up. After Griswold and Dominion executed their “Trusted Build update” Peters backed-up the systems again. When the before and after backups were compared by technical professionals, it was found that election records had been deleted in apparent violation of the Federal law’s definition of election records preservation. In their analysis of the backups, cyber experts identified open access points on the Dominion voting systems through which votes and vote tallies can be secretly altered without detection. Once it was discovered that Peters had properly backed-up her voting systems in accordance with the law, it unleashed a chain of illegal and unethical actions by a panicked Griswold. Griswold commandeered local, and Federal law enforcement to target Peters and her staff. Whether the law enforcement officials know they’re being used to deny public transparency or cover up potential evidence of Griswold’s illegal conduct is an open question. As undeniable technical proof-points mount, the motivation for the state’s attacks on Peters become clear.

The blatant government overreach included multiple raids on Peters’ office. In one raid, an armed fatigue-clad warrantless squad went to Peters’ home presumably at the direction of the Sec State and Mesa D.A. The raids, their severity, and threating nature shocked Peters given the fact that it’s her right and obligation to back-up election records. In addition, Dominion and the Sec. State directed all the CCRs to “back-up” their systems without any restrictions prior to the scheduled update. Now, Griswold and the D.A. are attacking using the full weight of the state claiming first-term Peters, a 65-year-old, Gold Star Mother, and cancer survivor is a criminal for following the law and upholding her sworn duty to the public who elected her.

In fear of her safety, Peters is now being protected by patriots, much to the ire of the Mesa County Commissioners.  In yesterday’s meeting, Commissioner Janet Rowland aggressively used it as a forum to try Peters in the court of public opinion.  Rowland parroted Griswold’s and D.A. Starr’s accusations as if she’d been briefed. During questioning appeared as if Rowland, CNN reporter Paul Murphy, and County Attorney Starr were working in tandem to pin criminality on Bishop or Smith.  Nearly hysterical Rowland repeatedly asked who was in possession of “the images” (the before and after backup records) that show unequivocally that Mesa’s election records had been deleted from the Dominion machines.

By the end of the meeting, Rowland outed her own arrogance and disinterest in the concerns of the people she represents.  Rowland was presented with an extensive list of Dominion’s system vulnerabilities by a military expert Ret. USAF Col. Shawn Smith who has deep domain knowledge.  However, the proven vulnerabilities weren’t enough to convince Rowland and the other commissioners.  Rowland claimed that the citizens must obtain and prove there were internet connections, cyber-attacks, and hacking before Rowland and the Commissioners would opt out of the Dominion contract.  Rowland showed she had no grasp of what she heard in the meeting, given her ask.  Citizens and experts couldn’t possibly prove internet connections, attacks or hacking without a forensic audit of the machines.  It appears Rowland proved the predicate and the necessity for a full forensic audit in Mesa County. However, Rowland’s actions pale in comparison to the orchestrated acts of Dominion and Griswold.

To share and distribute a .pdf copy of the above press release, download the file below,

# # #

Lawless SoS Griswold Attacks Hero Clerk Peters: National Spotlight on CO Election Issues

Cyber Symposium: CO, Peters, and USEIP Steal Spotlight 

Last week, the world watched as Colorado grabbed global headlines by showcasing its anomalies in 2020 election data.  Many were stunned at the depth and breadth of the accomplishments of Colorado voters achieved in their pursuit of the truth of the 2020 elections.  

USEIP volunteers, too many to name, were instrumental both on-stage and behind the scenes with communications, data, process, and equipment analysis that facilitated a successful symposium. Many who had never seen Dr. Frank’s data were shocked to see that in his modeling and analysis, his publicly available data-set is from Colorado.  

The mock election demonstration by Ret. USAF Col. Shawn Smith of USEIP clearly demonstrates in a 7 minute video exactly how to commit election fraud with the current Dominion machines and how easy it is to make the paper ballot count match up with the fraudulent results.  Smith’s work shows any election official denying the possibility of the fraud happening through the machines is flat-out wrong.  More from Smith on the symposium…

While many were disappointed in not seeing the payoff of Lindell’s promise of irrefutable proof showing that “China hacked and stole the 2020 elections through ‘the machines’”, there were realities of happenings behind the scenes that somewhat stopped that from happening in the way many expected.  Most importantly, Lindell’s team was apprised of the situation that the data to be presented was to be “poison pilled.” Which means ruined, marred, or fully damaged through illegal inputs or deletions. Lindell’s team made the executive call to avoid damage to the raw data.  What this means is that Lindell still has the full set of unmolested data that still has been and can be further analyzed and presented in court.  Watch for more to come on this in the coming weeks. 

The Smoking Gun: Mesa News Breaks at Symposium

Unexpectedly, Tina Peters the County Clerk and Recorder of Mesa County (Gold Star Mother, cancer survivor, and first-term election official) emerged as a national hero during the symposium, putting a face and story to the data that was presented and analyzed in real-time on day two of the event.  Tina’s bravery showed the world that, in Colorado, we have a lawless, unethical, and potentially criminal Colorado Secretary of State. Jena Griswold continues to overstep the legal parameters of her office in an attempt to cover her actions, in partnership with Dominion, in the November 2020 election.  Full story here…

THE SMOKING GUN:  Election Records that are legally supposed to be preserved for 25 months per Colorado law, and 22 months according to Federal Law have been deleted from Mesa County’s Dominion machines.  Proven by ‘before and after’ data evidence. Investigations are underway.  Get smart on how Dominion and audits work Read More….

Griswold Shocks Nation with Wild Overreach: Raids

  • Griswold raided Clerk Peter’s office on August 10th with the approval of Mesa County DA, Dan Rubenstein and the newly appointed Sheriff Matt Lewis.  View warrant documents: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, DA and Sheriff’s contact info.
  • Griswold raided a home, in the middle of the night, with four children asleep. In the raid all electronics were confiscated, including children’s devices.  This is related to the earlier raid.  
  • Griswold then raided Peter’s office a second time where she, in cooperation with Mesa County DA and Sheriff, seized the voting equipment.  Strangely there was no accounting of the equipment that was taken, 

Griswold Goes Totalitarian:  Clear Violation of CO Law

Griswold states she is going to appoint Peter’s replacement (potentially temporary) for the Nov elections in Mesa County.  Bottom-Line: Griswold has no authority whatsoever to remove from position nor appoint any election officer designated by the governing jurisdiction (County Commissioners) in a county.  She might as well be Xi Jinping, declaring herself ruler.  In fact, CO State Rep. Ron Hanks calls for Griswold’s resignation. Her ONLY statutory path for enforcement is through injunction in the applicable District Court, on the basis of motion filed by CO Attorney General.  In fact, Griswold herself, is likely in violation of 52 USC 20701. County Commissioners, the DA and the Sheriff in Mesa are now faced with whether or not they’ll allow The State to come in and rule Mesa, or are they going to stand up for the citizens and the rule of law?

Griswold’s Hand-Picked Surrogate Operatives: SERIOUS Conflicts of Interest

The two people selected to run the Mesa Co elections are Wayne Williams, current El Paso City Council member and Senior Advisor to Runbeck Election Systems and Mesa County Treasurer Sheila Reiner.  Here are the conflicts of interest of both questionable potential appointees. Additional context read more…

Wayne Williams Power Grabbing and Making Money Off Elections

  • Already holds office – Currently Sits on the City Council of El Paso County along with his wife, a current El Paso County Commissioner. 
  • Works for Runbeck Currently the Senior Advisor of Runbeck Election Services. – a ballot printing and election automation company headquartered in Arizona.  Runbeck has been accused of being involved in pre-printing ballots across the U.S. proof of this is expected to surface as details from the Maricopa Audit Report are analyzed. 
  • Mesa is a customer of Runbeck Mesa County recently signed a $100(k)-$300(k) ballot printing contract with Runbeck in July of 2021.
  • Forced Dominion mandated the use of Dominion machines across Colorado in 2015. forcing all CO counties to adopt the sketchy technology.  Counties had to sue Williams to opt-out of machine adoption. 
  • Called on Peters to resign in the midst of the current investigation.  Completely without fact or full understanding of the case.  Republicans are calling out Williams for his irresponsible and foolish declaration.  Read State Rep. Ron Hanks statement…
  • Claims no fraud in CO, repeats “gold standard” trope Williams has a vested interest in ensuring no fraud is found in CO given his past actions as SoS, Dominion advocate, and current position with Runbeck. 
  • CO Election officials reject Williams as a choice for Mesa elections official.

Sheila Reiner Playing Dirty:  Re-registers to Certify Elections on Aug. 3 While Acting Mesa Treasurer — Acts On Grudge Against Peters… 

  • Reiner tried and failed to recall Peters  Reiner led the effort to recall Peters from office in 2020.
  • Planned to get re-involved in Mesa elections — before all this: Reiner is currently the Mesa County Treasurer.  In an unexplained twist, records show Reiner re-upped her official credentials to run and certify elections on August 3, 2021, according to her Facebook post.  This suggests Reiner may have had previous knowledge of Griswold’s plans to raid Peter’s office and frame Tina for the leak that came from the Secretary of State’s Office. Further official investigation is warranted.
  • Scandal plagued Reiner – Reiner left her position as CCR in the midst of a security scandal.  Once Peters was in office after defeating Reiner, Peters discovered troubling security breaches that Reiner and her staff had committed with access issues (keys, access cards etc.)  Peters presented the information to the Mesa County DA, Rubinstein but he refused to investigate the case.  Now DA Rubenstein is investigating Peters.
  • Lied about party affiliation – Several Mesa residents have come forward mentioning that Reiner is not actually a Republican.  Sherronna Bishop, America’s Mom explains she was talking with Reiner at a women’s political meeting in Mesa County; asking why Reiner was leading the recall of Tina Peters a fellow Republican. “It didn’t make sense.  I didn’t know Tina well at the time, but she had been delivering on all her campaign promises“.  When Bishop pushed further, Reiner gave a duplicitous response, “Everyone knows a Democrat can’t get elected in Mesa…”.  Did Reiner lie about her political affiliation to get elected? 
  • Reiner in bed with Dems, Dominion, and dirty CO County Clerks Association Sure, we can all have friends and colleagues – on the other hand, we are judged by the company we keep. This raises real issues for Reiner in terms of being objective and unbiased when it comes to Peters and Mesa County.

Connecting the Dots: Why Did Griswold Pick Reiner to Replace Peters?

Griswold looks to be in serious legal trouble that continues to mount.  Why would Griswold raid, threaten, seize, and now illegally appointing election surrogates in Mesa?  Clearly there’s something she does NOT want the public to see.  Turns out Griswold is following in the footsteps of Raffensberger as he attempts to put Fulton County GA in receivership in order to get his hands on the data, machines, records, paper ballots etc. in order to cover his tracks.  Griswold’s moves in Mesa are straight from the playbook.  The goal is to gain control of the array of election records through either compromised surrogate Williams or Reiner.  Watch for this pattern of “cover-up power grabs” to continue across the U.S. as more counties and states conduct election forensic audits.

Can’t Spell Feckless Without a KBB 

Turns out the CO GOP Chair Kristi Burton Brown is as feckless as the rest of the GOP establishment across the nation when it comes to election integrity.  In a leaked message KBB’s cowardice and lack of understanding of the law is on full display as she encourages candidates to steer clear of the fight in Mesa County.  In fact, KBB declined to do her homework that would show many of Griswold’s claims have no legal backing. However, it’s no surprise.  KBB has been completely silent on the topic of election integrity since she’s been elected in December.  Among her growing list of failures:

  • Broken promises to work with “the grassroots” on election integrity.
  • Republican voter registrations bleed  With KBB at the helm, she’s responsible for dismal results.  The CO GOP is bleeding registered members in synch with the CO DNC trend.  Bottom line, unaffiliated voters show strong growth showing voters on both sides are done with the uniparty establishment.  
  • Bending the knee to Griswold. During KBB’s run for State GOP Chair, she used the work and experience of election integrity experts in Boulder County as her foundation for her position on election integrity. The BoCo team had worked for years to make headway to ensure free and fair elections in a navy blue county. Jena took KBB’s election integrity platform (based on BoCo’s work), analyzed it, deconstructed it point-by-point and ensured all BoCo’s forward progress was dismantled through Griswold’s Emergency Rules and Permanent Rules changes. What’s so incredibly sad is that KBB didn’t stand up against Griswold’s overreach and defend the good work of the County GOP teams on EI which she gladly used to get elected. Instead, she sat silent cowering as Griswold ate the GOP’s lunch.
  • Declining to fight – Declining to testify at the Aug. 3 hearing against Griswold’s emergency and permanent election rules that hurt all CO voters. 

Tone deaf KBB is following Rona McDaniels marching orders straight from the top of the RNC by using election integrity to raise money, but when the fight is real – turning into cowards and running from the election integrity fight. 

Lucky, the County GOP Chairs are independent and are not required to report to the weak and ineffective State GOP.  Expect to see CO voters supporting conservative candidates directly.  Those who are values and issues aligned, but do not want to be labeled “Republican” will have support from the mass of “unaffiliated” voters in upcoming elections. 

###